Posted on Leave a comment

Why people are falsely accused of refusal to take a breath test

A lot of people say they were accused of refusing to take the breath test at the police station. However, they did not refuse it. They believe they tried. How often does that happen? What do people say that tells you they actually did try to do the test?

Under the Implied Consent Law, you consent to this breath test. The law says if you refuse, there is an additional penalty. There are choices when faced with a breath test. You can take it; and we will discuss why you may want to consider not taking it.

You can also ask for additional time to make a phone call. Under Implied Consent statutes, you are entitled time to discuss your choice, or your options, with someone. It does not necessarily have to be an attorney.

If, at that time, you do request to speak with someone, the officer needs to afford you a reasonable period of time, and privacy, to make that phone call. Sometimes the person is upset at the point the officer is requesting a breath test. The person may request further explanation or additional time to consider their options.

Officers just read what is in the Implied Consent paperwork. They are not lawyers. They are not necessarily obligated to advise what the best options are. In some cases, they can hit refusal if they feel you are just dragging things out.

The experience of some folks has been that they did not actually refuse. They were just asking additional questions. I have had that situation with a number of different cases. In those situations, the analysis is: Was there an unreasonable delay; were you just asking for additional time to consider your options; or were you asking for time to make a phone call?

If you are asking for time to make a phone call and you are not afforded the time or privacy to make the phone call, then the refusal is no good.

It is a reasonableness standard. There is not an exact timeframe. However, most agencies and officers afford people 20 minutes. Sometimes people request to make the phone call.

I think it definitely improves your argument that you are considering what to do. It is not an actual refusal. The officer has to show that it was an actual refusal. Under the law, it absolutely cannot be a refusal if you say, “I need to make a phone call. I need privacy to do that.” You better your chances by being clear in your statement to the officer.

Posted on Leave a comment

Why hire the services of a labor lawyer

Before speaking about the need to hire a labor lawyer, it is convenient to indicate what is referred to with that expression. In short, a labor lawyer is a lawyer specialized in Labor Law or Labor Law.

Labor legislation has changed over time, and in recent years very sharply, due both to changes at the political level and the economic situation. For this reason, hiring the services of a labor lawyer is key for both companies and workers, since it is the professional who knows this regulation with all its changes and, also, the application that the courts make of it, is say, jurisprudence.

Reasons to hire a labor lawyer

Informative: Consulting with a labor lawyer allows you to find out about the legal implications that arise from a work reality. Knowing what these are is essential to know if rights are being respected, if it is appropriate to perform some action or if everything is correct. For example, a worker who suffers workplace harassment  will be interested in knowing what actions the law provides to report their situation and what can be claimed, as well as what evidence will be necessary to demonstrate that situation.

Preventive: Anticipating a possible future situation by obtaining prior advice can be crucial to avoid negative consequences. For example, a worker who believes that he will be fired will be interested in knowing what documents to sign and how, and when it will be an unfair dismissal. Or, if a company wants to make a decision such as an objective dismissal, it must have all the legal requirements for that dismissal to be correct and, therefore, minimize the risk of that decision being revoked in the future and ensure that be a proper dismissal.

Saving: In addition to the logical saving of time involved in delegating to a professional who knows the labor legal field, it can also sometimes mean saving money since being advised before taking a decision will allow it to be adjusted to the right and, therefore, it will minimize the risk of possible negative consequences with economic costs.

Security: If you have knowledge of the legal framework, the actions of a company can be carried out with the peace of mind of knowing what is in accordance with the regulations and what is not.

Professional assistance: In case of judicial procedure, it is essential to have the assistance of a professional who knows both substantive and procedural regulations, in order to assess the chances of success, know when it is best to seek an agreement to avoid a trial, as well like when you have to go to court, what questions to ask witnesses, when to question the opponent, what evidence to influence to prove what is interesting, etc.

In short, like everything in life, when we encounter doubts, discussions or conflicts that have to do with the workplace, whether you are a company or a worker, have the advice or assistance of a labor lawyer is always the better decision.

Posted on Leave a comment

The duration in which the time of arrears remains in effect

In effect, what they say most people experience is that delays rooming in force until fully paid. Delays occur because of failure to pay the fines ordered a cut in the time determined by the court. Alimony and child support are the most common forms of court-appointed positions, or penalties, depending on your perspective.

Many people who have been ordered to pay (paying) seem to lose sight of this. When payment is for alimony and child support or taxpayers and pay what is due to its commitments, these taxpayers are challenging the court therefore is challenging as your ex – spouse and children who It should support. When one challenges to the courts in this way, this can mean contempt charges. This is a very serious matter.

It’s bad enough that a defendant payer can be jailed for contempt each instance individually to non-payment for every case of contempt of court. Late payments, which are due by the time of the court, never disappear. Bankruptcy does not touch them. Only the court which established the time of payment may change. In judicial activities leading to payments and existing programming, the court had access to all the assets of all parties.

The contempt charges can lead to jail, but generally the courts contempt penalized by a monetary penalty, as well as the seizure of property and seizure. This begins the life of arrears. Several people on both sides of arrears say, even after the child grows, the child support or the spouse has remarried, courts require that the delays come until full payment. Any missed payment, late payments simply increases.

Federal law ensures sanctions of federal agencies. State laws complement federal law also excludes judicial state charges, payments and fines of bankruptcy discharge. If a person files for bankruptcy by mistake to exit payment assigned by the court, the court will keep the money for deposit and then discharge the case for the misuse of these laws. Some people say this is happening and some experts warn that people should not declare bankruptcy without at least consulting an attorney.

The consultation will probably be no cost, and counsel shall advise the person who wishes to file bankruptcy it would be a waste of time and money due to the likely dismissal. Some experts refer to it sometimes a payer of alimony and child support become somewhat irrational, having been advised by his lawyer that the non-payment of scheduled payments would become a backwardness, which is simply more money to pay. The easiest way of getting away is to pay what is owed.

Posted on Leave a comment

Points to discover if you can be a good lawyer

You like talking.

If you are a person who does not miss a good discussion to see who is right in all cases, he likes to discuss who is the best pianist in the world, what is the best restaurant in the city or if there are good restaurants in the city. The city has a good start to be a lawyer. One of the strengths of a good lawyer is the argument. The lawyers argue constantly; they do it to the other party, with other lawyers, judges and courts, with employees, insurance companies and even their own clients. The practice of the law is contradictory in itself, so if you want a good argument, well-founded in the area on the right can be a good option.

You want to write.

If you like to write and are good at what you do, you have to consider becoming a lawyer. The lawyers are writing continuously. Lawyers spend their days writing claims, resources, contracts, applications and hundreds of written communications per year. A good written fluency is a good resource for a lawyer. So you know, if you like writing, you are closer to having all the qualities of a good lawyer.

You are a workaholic.

You should know that many lawyers are addicted to work (either for pleasure or for professional reasons). In fact, there are lawyers who work from morning to night, surpassing normal use or professional day. To ensure success in the field of law, you have to work (also), so it is necessary to make some sacrifices, including excessive work hours. If you do not mind working from dawn until late at night, the field of law could be yours.

He is a good negotiator.

The lawyers negotiate and negotiate daily, they negotiate at all hours. In most procedures, agreements between the parties are an essential part. Therefore, the negotiation capacity positively influences the performance of a lawyer. There are many circumstances in which mediation should be required match, ignoring other older people with more time and disruptive to party procedures. This is another feature that will help you effectively perform the duties of a lawyer.

It is persuasive

This factor is especially important in certain procedures, such as the Jury, in the way of presenting the case and the persuasion to exercise the lawyer on its members, it is very important for the final decision in one way or another. The main job of a lawyer is to convince the rest of the participants in the process of defending the correct position. And all this can only be done with a lot of persuasion, skill and, of course, practice.

You know how to put your emotions at bay

Every good lawyer must have a good emotional shield, a “thick skin” or “broad shoulders”, as they say. Keep in mind that in their daily work, lawyers can deal with judges angry and in a bad mood, officials sometimes do not have a good day, customer’s angry and bitter enemies (which are often other lawyers). If you have a good suit of armor, surely the work of a lawyer will be much easier, which also helps to overcome the stress that this work produces.

The organization is your thing.

If you are good at organizing and balancing your time, you have an important step in making you a good lawyer. As a legal professional, you will spend your time between the desk, interviews with clients, several phone calls and appearances before the judge or court to follow your clients or co-workers, and as we have said before, often until in the afternoon from morning. You must have a good structured agenda and most important of all … do not forget your family, as it is the first.

Posted on Leave a comment

The qualities of the trial lawyer

A lawyer who never steps in the courts will never know how to deliver good service to his clients. The greatest compliment that a lawyer can receive is: “He is a good litigator.”

Although the main work of the lawyer is limited to the defense of the client before the Courts and Tribunals, the truth is that not all the members of an office intervene frequently in the courtroom. Different reasons such as the specialty of the lawyer, the internal organization of the office or even the lack of skills justify it. In fact, an important segment tends to evade this intervention. However, the work in the forum is fundamental for the lawyer, since the act of the trial, whatever the jurisdictional order, is the high point for the defense of the case and the place where, in front of the adversary, there will be deploy all the skills that make up our profession.

With this background, in this post we will examine some of the qualities that, in our opinion, should adorn the trial lawyer or litigant.

The litigating lawyer must be, above all, a scholar. The defense of the matter always requires knowledge of the rules, doctrine and jurisprudence applicable to the case, since in the phase of report or conclusions you must properly reason your request. If it is he who has taken the matter from the beginning , it is obvious that his pre-trial study will be more settled and will require less effort; but if the background comes from another partner, you must perform, before the trial, a thorough study of the subject.

Being organized is also an essential skill. By knowing the date of our intervention well in advance, the trial lawyer has to be carefully organized to prepare the two fundamental phases of the trial: practice of the test and conclusions. To do this, you must know how to manage criteria of organization and time management by establishing temporary milestones for the preparation of the case. There is nothing more disastrous for a lawyer than to prepare a trial the day before the hearing, except, of course, in those cases in which the circumstances of the case have not allowed the preparation (replacement of another partner, sudden assignment, etc.

Linked to the above is constancy and discipline. Steadfastness is the virtue that leads us, once a decision or concrete decision has been made, to carry out what is necessary to achieve the goals even if external or internal difficulties arise or personal motivation diminishes, thanks to an ongoing effort to move to the action overcoming the difficulties. Without discipline, the preparation of a trial will be difficult, especially when, as we have seen, a well- studied study and preparation of the case is essential, and there are doubts that during its preparation difficulties and adversities will arise, such as unforeseen events or the temporary accumulation of work. .

The trial lawyer will never leave anything to chance. Every judgment requires a clear determination of the strategy to be followed; the preparation of the interrogations, both of our witnesses and those of the opposing party, and the preparation of the report. Everything, absolutely everything, must be measured and planned.

Related to the above is the ability to concentrate. On stage, the lawyer must know the “topography of the room” and be permanently alert and focused on everything that happens around him,   not losing sight of any detail that may help his defense. Precisely, ingenuity and the ability to react will be key in judgment.

In the courtroom, lawyers must be great communicators: they are eloquent and imaginative and ingenious, which is fundamental since in the forum there are numerous situations in which lawyers must communicate effectively: interrogations, clarifications to the judge or to the parties, the report. A lawyer in the room should aspire to be a better speaker each time. To this end, not only public speaking techniques must be perfected, but also skills in the effective practice of interrogations.

On the bench, the lawyer should have aplomb and dignity and should not be shown with a shrug. The faint-heartedness weakens the persuasive force of the report and, without diminishing the consideration and respect due to the Court and the parties, the forensic speaker must bear in mind that he is neither a superior nor a subordinate, as such speaker, but the spokesman of an autonomous right, that of freedom of defense .

In short, these are some, but not all, qualities that in our opinion should have every lawyer who intervenes in the forum and, as can be easily concluded, represent by themselves, a true reflection of the complex.

Posted on Leave a comment

Tips for hiring a personal injury lawyer

Enduring an accident can be a challenge, no doubt, but having an experienced law firm by your side can ease the burden of the accident. A lawyer can help you with any concerns you have regarding particular laws applicable to your case. In the same way, an efficient lawyer should prepare him for any conference or conciliation trial that may occur. In fact, your lawyer must have a good sense of logic and creativity to design a unique strategy to win your case. Here are some useful tips when looking for a personal injury lawyer:

Diligence

If you are constantly reminding your lawyer to write documents or schedule conciliation conferences, you may not be the best person to handle your case. Like any job, a lawyer should be eager to help answer any questions and organize a success plan for your case. An important part of keeping a successful case includes having constant communication with your lawyer and making sure that your lawyers have all the necessary and complete documents within a set time frame so as not to affect your case negatively.

Inventiveness

A great lawyer investigates the incident thoroughly and makes reasonable judgments based on the information provided. In addition, a great lawyer is insightful and should be able to investigate any additional information related to your case and can use this information to your advantage. Consequently, a great lawyer should be able to make creative decisions based on the problems and unique circumstances of the problems presented.

Communication

During a consultation with your prospective lawyer, ask the questions of your greatest concern. A great lawyer must have stellar interpersonal skills and be able to make you feel safe by asking these questions about your case. In addition, a good lawyer must have good public speaking skills and be able to present your case effortlessly.

Experience

With all the above skills listed, experience is key to a successful lawyer. Over the years, a great lawyer would have developed a special strategy in handling different cases or going to the courtroom. A great lawyer learns how to execute a successful case by trial and error.

Posted on Leave a comment

Underage DUI cases in Ohio

Individuals under 21 charged with drunk driving offenses in Ohio face some different rules than individuals over 21. While the blood alcohol limit for people 21 and over is .08, the limit for people under 21 is .02; one-fourth as much. It is clear why there is little tolerance for an underage person to drive drunk. The tough penalties associated with underage drunk driving, however, can be devastating for a young person. If you or your child has been charged with underage DUI in Ohio, a skilled DUI attorney can help.

Investigation of Ohio underage DUI 

Although the alcohol limit is different for people under age 21, the DUI investigation is essentially the same. Officers who encounter an underage driver looks for clues that the driver is under the influence while the vehicle is in motion and during personal contact with the driver. If clues of intoxication are observed, the officer administers field sobriety tests.  If additional clues are observed, the officer arrests the driver and administers a breath test, blood test, or urine test.  The officer then charges the driver with DUI, Operating a Vehicle after Underage Consumption (OVUAC), or both.

Charges for underage drunk driving in Ohio

If a person under 21 has an alcohol test result over .02 but under .08, they are ordinarily charged with Operating a Vehicle after Underage Consumption (O.V.U.A.C.). If the test result is over .08, the charge is OVI (DUI) “per se”, and there is an Administrative License Suspension. In addition, there is often a charge of OVI (DUI) “impaired”. That charge does not depend on the result of a chemical alcohol test; it’s based on impaired driving ability. The charges will be filed in adult court or juvenile court, depending on the age of the driver. If the charges are filed in juvenile court, the court process is slightly different.

Sentencing for underage DUI

Sentencing for a person under 21 depends on the charge and the court. If the person is found guilty of DUI , the penalties are listed on the “DUI  Sentences” page of this website. If the person is found guilty of O.V.U.A.C. in adult court, the sentence for a first offense may include a jail sentence of up to 30 days, a fine of up to $250, a license suspension of up to two years, yellow license plates, alcohol treatment, and probation. For a second O.V.U.A.C. conviction in adult court, the jail sentence may be up to 60 days, the fine may be up to $500, and the license suspension may be up to five years.  If the person is convicted in juvenile court (“adjudicated”), the sentence (“disposition”) may include a license suspension of up to two years, alcohol treatment, a fine, and probation.

A person convicted of O.V.U.A.C. must wait a mandatory 60 days to get limited driving privileges. Additionally, a person convicted of O.V.U.A.C. must re-take the driver’s license test and periodically provide proof of insurance with the Ohio B.M.V. A conviction for O.V.U.A.C. can also enhance a later conviction for O.V.I. so the later conviction carries tougher mandatory minimum penalties, and it could lead to being listed in the habitual offender registry.

Strategies for underage DUI defense

When I represent a person under 21 for charges of OVI and/or OVUAC, I apply the same thorough process used for clients over 21. We obtain the prosecutor’s evidence, conduct an investigation, seek to exclude evidence, and negotiate with the prosecutor. If we do not reach an acceptable agreement, we have a trial.

Posted on Leave a comment

Virginia DUI refusal to take a blood or breath test

Implied consent

Virginia law requires you to take a blood or breath test if you are arrested for a DUI. Virginia’s “implied consent” law says that if you are lawfully arrested by an officer who has probable cause to believe that you have been driving under the influence, and then you consent to taking a chemical test of your blood, breath, or both for the purpose of determining your blood alcohol content (BAC) or the presence of drugs.  The test or tests must be taken within three hours of driving and in most cases; the officer will offer you the breath test first. If the breath test is unavailable or if you can’t complete a breath test, then the officer will ask for a blood test.

You could be asked to take a preliminary breath test even before you have been arrested. This works like a field sobriety test. The officer will use the results to establish probable cause that you were driving under the influence. You do not have to take this preliminary test and if you refuse it, evidence of this refusal cannot be used against you later in court. Refusing it, however, probably won’t work in your favor if the officer has some other reason to think you had been drinking. Based on that other reason, the officer could still arrest you and then you will be required to take a test under the law.

Refusing to take the test

Once you are arrested, the officer should tell you that if you refuse to take a chemical test, then evidence of your refusal can be used against you in court and your license will be suspended. For your first refusal, your license will be suspended for one year. Also, this first refusal is not considered a crime. However, Virginia law classifies a second or any subsequent refusal as a misdemeanor, which is a crime that would stay on your record. For your second or any subsequent refusal within ten years, your suspension will last for three years.

The officer will suspend your license as soon as you refuse, but that does not start the clock on the one-year or three-year suspension periods explained above. This suspension begun by the officer is called an administrative suspension and its length depends on whether you have had any prior DUI convictions or refusals. The suspension period could be as short as seven days or as long as 60 days, but it will be in addition to the one or three-year penalties for your refusal.

Should you refuse to take a mandatory DUI Test in Virginia?

It usually does not help you to refuse to take a blood or breath test when you are arrested. For a first DUI in Virginia, you will have to pay a fine of $250. You will also have to go to jail if your BAC is .15%, which is almost twice the legal limit of .08%. Assuming your BAC is less than .15%, this is a milder penalty than a year-long suspension for refusal. Still, refusing the test does not guarantee that you won’t be convicted – you could be found guilty of a DUI even if your refusal means that the state does not have proof that your BAC was over.08%, the legal limit for those over 21. In fact, the prosecution can use your refusal against you by arguing that you refused the test because you knew that you were intoxicated and guilty of DUI.

Get Help with your DUI

If you have been arrested on a DUI charge in Virginia or any other state, get help from an experienced DUI attorney. Unlike other traffic related charges, which might be worth fighting without a lawyer, conviction for a DUI has serious consequences – especially if the incident involved injury to people or property, or if it’s your second or subsequent DUI. To avoid or reduce the consequences, your best bet is to find an attorney who is knowledgeable about your state’s laws and about how the system works in your county’s court.

Posted on Leave a comment

Traffic Laws DUI IL

The state of Illinois has very strict laws regarding traffic offenses and DUI (driving under the influence of alcohol), and if you are caught breaking the law, may be in serious trouble. Speeding construction zones and school zones can take a heavy toll on our state, and in some cases fines can reach as high as $ 10,000 for a crime. If you have been charged with a traffic offense or DUI, it is essential to obtain legal representation of a DUI defense attorney in Chicago. The legal team is highly qualified and experienced in the struggle for the defense of persons facing serious traffic violations or DUI charges of all kinds.

State lawmakers have created laws that severely punish those who are caught driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. A first DUI conviction can result in up to one year in prison, up to $ 2,500 in fines, and you could lose your right to drive for up to a year or more if found to have had a child under age 16 in their vehicle at the time of arrest.

We strongly recommend that you contact a company lawyer immediately if you have been recommended arrested for DUI, and before discussing your case with someone in the police station. Their conversations, actions and behavior will be brought to court by the police as part of the evidence against him. As a first action, you should contact the company so you can make sure that your rights are protected.

Posted on Leave a comment

What are the penalties for DUI?

Driving under the influence (DUI) of drugs or alcohol is typically punished by almost all countries with a high number of motor vehicles and alcohol. Penalties for DUI tend to vary from country to country, and may even be different, depending on the state or province within a country. In most areas, however, the punishments often involve the revocation of a license to drive for a certain period of time and can include imprisonment or substantial fines as well. The penalties for DUI in the United States (USA), for example, can vary slightly from state to state, but will usually include a loss of legal capacity to drive.

Penalties for DUI typically vary from region to region, but there are some commonalities between the different laws and penalties in different areas. Most countries and states will revoke a persona driver license or other document allowing him or her to drive legally. In the US, for example, anyone caught driving over the legal limit will typically have their license revoked for 90 days on a first offense. Most states will then revoke the license the persona  for a year on a second offense, and may revoke your license for up to three years after a third offense.

There are also specific penalties for DUI committed by someone under the legal drinking age of 21 years in the US. Anyone under the legal age to consume alcohol that is found driving with even a small amount of alcohol in your system, less than the legal limit for someone aged 21 will have his license revoked for a certain period of time. This can often be until he or she reaches 18 years of age, and these penalties for DUI are national in scope and not based on each state.

In Canada, there are similar national laws as well as many penalties for DUI are based on provincial laws. For example, in Ontario the penalties for DUI typically include both the suspension of the license driver and jail time service. The first offense in Ontario will normally be punished by a fine and the loss of a portfolio driver s for a year. Anyone who is convicted of a second offense will usually serve 14 days in prison and lose his license for three years; Subsequent convictions are often punished with 90 days in jail and suspension of license indefinitely your driver.

The legal limit for DUI or DWI varies by state.

  • Temporary custody orders may include service requirements to the community.
  • Jail time may be required of those accused of a DUI.
  • DUI penalties may depend on whether someone was found guilty of DUI earlier.